Language: RU EN

Comparison

Winner: Tie

Both sources show similar manipulation risk. Compare factual evidence directly.

Topics

Технологии и AI

Instant verdict

Less biased source: Tie
More emotional framing: Tie
More one-sided framing: Tie
Weaker evidence quality: Tie
More manipulative overall: Tie

Narrative conflict

Source A main narrative

Jan 30, 2026 10:33:00 According to OpenAI, at the time of writing, the majority of users were using GPT-5.2, and the number of users using GPT-4o had dropped to just 0.1%.

Source B main narrative

In Brief Posted: 10:10 AM PST · February 13, 2026 Image Credits:Silas Stein/picture alliance / Getty Images Starting Friday, OpenAI will cease providing access to five legacy ChatGPT models, including the popu…

Conflict summary

Stance contrast: Jan 30, 2026 10:33:00 According to OpenAI, at the time of writing, the majority of users were using GPT-5.2, and the number of users using GPT-4o had dropped to just 0.1%. Alternative framing: In Brief Posted: 10:10 AM PST · February 13, 2026 Image Credits:Silas Stein/picture alliance / Getty Images Starting Friday, OpenAI will cease providing access to five legacy ChatGPT models, including the popu…

Source A stance

Jan 30, 2026 10:33:00 According to OpenAI, at the time of writing, the majority of users were using GPT-5.2, and the number of users using GPT-4o had dropped to just 0.1%.

Stance confidence: 53%

Source B stance

In Brief Posted: 10:10 AM PST · February 13, 2026 Image Credits:Silas Stein/picture alliance / Getty Images Starting Friday, OpenAI will cease providing access to five legacy ChatGPT models, including the popu…

Stance confidence: 53%

Central stance contrast

Stance contrast: Jan 30, 2026 10:33:00 According to OpenAI, at the time of writing, the majority of users were using GPT-5.2, and the number of users using GPT-4o had dropped to just 0.1%. Alternative framing: In Brief Posted: 10:10 AM PST · February 13, 2026 Image Credits:Silas Stein/picture alliance / Getty Images Starting Friday, OpenAI will cease providing access to five legacy ChatGPT models, including the popu…

Why this pair fits comparison

  • Candidate type: Closest similar
  • Comparison quality: 44%
  • Event overlap score: 15%
  • Contrast score: 70%
  • Contrast strength: Weak but valid compare
  • Stance contrast strength: High
  • Event overlap: Event overlap is weak. Overlap is inferred from broader contextual signals.
  • Contrast signal: Interpretive contrast is visible, but event linkage is moderate: verify against primary sources.
  • Why conflict is limited: Some contrast exists, but event linkage is weak: this is closer to an adjacent angle than a strong battle pair.
  • Stronger comparison suggestion: This direct pair is weak: open conflict-mode similar search to pick a stronger contrast angle.
  • Use stronger suggestion

Key claims and evidence

Key claims in source A

  • Jan 30, 2026 10:33:00 According to OpenAI, at the time of writing, the majority of users were using GPT-5.2, and the number of users using GPT-4o had dropped to just 0.1%.
  • OpenAI explains, 'We understand that losing GPT-4o will be frustrating for some users.
  • While retiring models is not easy, retiring older models allows us to focus on improving the current models used by many of our users.' The four models will still be available via API.
  • The four models will become unusable on February 13, 2026.

Key claims in source B

  • In Brief Posted: 10:10 AM PST · February 13, 2026 Image Credits:Silas Stein/picture alliance / Getty Images Starting Friday, OpenAI will cease providing access to five legacy ChatGPT models, including the popular but co…
  • In a recent blog post, OpenAI noted that only 0.1% of customers have been using GPT-4o, but for a company with 800 million weekly active users, that small percentage still amounts to 800,000 people.
  • The 4o model has been at the center of a number of lawsuits concerning user self-harm, delusional behavior, and AI psychosis.
  • In addition to GPT-4o, the GPT-5, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini models have also been deprecated.

Text evidence

Evidence from source A

  • key claim
    Jan 30, 2026 10:33:00 According to OpenAI, at the time of writing, the majority of users were using GPT-5.2, and the number of users using GPT-4o had dropped to just 0.1%.

    A key claim that anchors the narrative framing.

  • key claim
    OpenAI explains, 'We understand that losing GPT-4o will be frustrating for some users.

    A key claim that anchors the narrative framing.

Evidence from source B

  • key claim
    In Brief Posted: 10:10 AM PST · February 13, 2026 Image Credits:Silas Stein/picture alliance / Getty Images Starting Friday, OpenAI will cease providing access to five legacy ChatGPT models…

    A key claim that anchors the narrative framing.

  • key claim
    In a recent blog post, OpenAI noted that only 0.1% of customers have been using GPT-4o, but for a company with 800 million weekly active users, that small percentage still amounts to 800,00…

    A key claim that anchors the narrative framing.

Bias/manipulation evidence

No concise text evidence snippets were extracted for this section yet.

How score signals are formed

Bias score signal Bias signal combines framing pressure, emotional wording, selective emphasis, and one-sided narrative markers.
Emotionality signal Emotionality rises when evidence contains emotionally loaded wording and evaluative labels.
One-sidedness signal One-sidedness rises when one frame dominates and alternative interpretations are weakly represented.
Evidence strength signal Evidence strength rises with concrete claims, attributed statements, and verifiable contextual support.

Source A

26%

emotionality: 25 · one-sidedness: 30

Detected in Source A
framing effect

Source B

26%

emotionality: 25 · one-sidedness: 30

Detected in Source B
framing effect

Metrics

Bias score Source A: 26 · Source B: 26
Emotionality Source A: 25 · Source B: 25
One-sidedness Source A: 30 · Source B: 30
Evidence strength Source A: 70 · Source B: 70

Framing differences

Possible omitted/downplayed context

Related comparisons

Compare these sources again Compare source A again Compare source B again Check another resource