Language: RU EN

Comparison

Winner: Source A is less manipulative

Source A appears less manipulative than Source B for this narrative.

Topics

London Marathon

Instant verdict

Less biased source: Source A
More emotional framing: Source B
More one-sided framing: Source B
Weaker evidence quality: Source B
More manipulative overall: Source B

Narrative conflict

Source A main narrative

Usually held in April, the 2021 race was held on Sunday October 3 because of the coronavirus pandemic.

Source B main narrative

Runners will take to the streets of London to complete the epic 26 mile race.

Conflict summary

Stance contrast: Usually held in April, the 2021 race was held on Sunday October 3 because of the coronavirus pandemic. Alternative framing: Runners will take to the streets of London to complete the epic 26 mile race.

Source A stance

Usually held in April, the 2021 race was held on Sunday October 3 because of the coronavirus pandemic.

Stance confidence: 50%

Source B stance

Runners will take to the streets of London to complete the epic 26 mile race.

Stance confidence: 53%

Central stance contrast

Stance contrast: Usually held in April, the 2021 race was held on Sunday October 3 because of the coronavirus pandemic. Alternative framing: Runners will take to the streets of London to complete the epic 26 mile race.

Why this pair fits comparison

  • Candidate type: Likely contrasting perspective
  • Comparison quality: 65%
  • Event overlap score: 56%
  • Contrast score: 70%
  • Contrast strength: Strong comparison
  • Stance contrast strength: High
  • Event overlap: Story-level overlap is substantial. URL context points to the same episode.
  • Contrast signal: Stance contrast: Usually held in April, the 2021 race was held on Sunday October 3 because of the coronavirus pandemic. Alternative framing: Runners will take to the streets of London to complete the epic 26 mile race.

Key claims and evidence

Key claims in source A

  • Usually held in April, the 2021 race was held on Sunday October 3 because of the coronavirus pandemic.
  • The 2020 event was also in October, and only open to professional athletes.
  • More than just one of the top five world marathon majors, the London Marathon is a celebratory sporting festival that attracts professional athletes, enthusiastic joggers and costume-wearing charity fundraisers from all…

Key claims in source B

  • Runners will take to the streets of London to complete the epic 26 mile race.
  • The London Marathon 2026 will take place on Sunday, April 26, and will begin at Greenwich and Blackheath, and will end on the Mall, opposite St James’s Park.
  • This year’s wheelchair race will begin at 8.50am, followed by the elite women’s race at 9.05am and the elite men at 9.35am.
  • From around 9.30am to 11.30am a sequence of start waves will take place for mass participation, with short gaps in between to allow the course to clear.

Text evidence

Evidence from source A

  • key claim
    Usually held in April, the 2021 race was held on Sunday October 3 because of the coronavirus pandemic.

    A key claim that anchors the narrative framing.

  • key claim
    The 2020 event was also in October, and only open to professional athletes.

    A key claim that anchors the narrative framing.

Evidence from source B

  • key claim
    Runners will take to the streets of London to complete the epic 26 mile race.

    A key claim that anchors the narrative framing.

  • key claim
    The London Marathon 2026 will take place on Sunday, April 26, and will begin at Greenwich and Blackheath, and will end on the Mall, opposite St James’s Park.

    A key claim that anchors the narrative framing.

Bias/manipulation evidence

No concise text evidence snippets were extracted for this section yet.

How score signals are formed

Bias score signal Bias signal combines framing pressure, emotional wording, selective emphasis, and one-sided narrative markers.
Emotionality signal Emotionality rises when evidence contains emotionally loaded wording and evaluative labels.
One-sidedness signal One-sidedness rises when one frame dominates and alternative interpretations are weakly represented.
Evidence strength signal Evidence strength rises with concrete claims, attributed statements, and verifiable contextual support.

Source A

26%

emotionality: 27 · one-sidedness: 30

Detected in Source A
framing effect

Source B

35%

emotionality: 29 · one-sidedness: 35

Detected in Source B
Emotional reasoning

Metrics

Bias score Source A: 26 · Source B: 35
Emotionality Source A: 27 · Source B: 29
One-sidedness Source A: 30 · Source B: 35
Evidence strength Source A: 70 · Source B: 64

Framing differences

Possible omitted/downplayed context

Related comparisons

Compare these sources again Compare source A again Compare source B again Check another resource