Source A
5 custom ChatGPT instructions I use to get better AI results - faster
zdnet.com
https://www.zdnet.com/article/custom-chatgpt-instructions-better-ai-results-faster/
Comparison
Winner: Source A is less manipulative
Source A appears less manipulative than Source B for this narrative.
Source B
ChatGPT prompting 101: How to get better AI results
timesfreepress.com
https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2026/feb/03/chatgpt-prompting-101-how-to-get-better-ai-results/
Topics
Instant verdict
Less biased source: Source A
More emotional framing: Source A
More one-sided framing: Source B
Weaker evidence quality: Source B
More manipulative overall: Source B
Narrative conflict
Source A main narrative
Screenshot by David Gewirtz/ZDNETSo, I can tell the AI something like, "Back in ID 031 you said blah-blah.
Source B main narrative
The AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.
Conflict summary
Stance contrast: Screenshot by David Gewirtz/ZDNETSo, I can tell the AI something like, "Back in ID 031 you said blah-blah. Alternative framing: The AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.
Source A stance
Screenshot by David Gewirtz/ZDNETSo, I can tell the AI something like, "Back in ID 031 you said blah-blah.
Stance confidence: 69%
Source B stance
The AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.
Stance confidence: 53%
Central stance contrast
Stance contrast: Screenshot by David Gewirtz/ZDNETSo, I can tell the AI something like, "Back in ID 031 you said blah-blah. Alternative framing: The AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.
Why this pair fits comparison
- Candidate type: Closest similar
- Comparison quality: 49%
- Event overlap score: 21%
- Contrast score: 75%
- Contrast strength: Strong comparison
- Stance contrast strength: High
- Event overlap: Event overlap is weak. Headlines describe a close episode.
- Contrast signal: Interpretive contrast is visible, but event linkage is moderate: verify against primary sources.
Key claims and evidence
Key claims in source A
- Screenshot by David Gewirtz/ZDNETSo, I can tell the AI something like, "Back in ID 031 you said blah-blah.
- Now, when I paste in a longer prompt, it will just respond with a simple statement saying it's waiting for further instructions.
- Avoid tables that will be too wide for the page to be read.
- Try this surprising trick, researchers sayYour custom instructions will need to be fairly short, which gives ChatGPT more wiggle room.
Key claims in source B
- The AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.
- Material from the Associated Press is Copyright © 2026, Associated Press and may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Times Free Press, Inc.
- Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium.
Text evidence
Evidence from source A
-
key claim
Screenshot by David Gewirtz/ZDNETSo, I can tell the AI something like, "Back in ID 031 you said blah-blah.
A key claim that anchors the narrative framing.
-
key claim
Now, when I paste in a longer prompt, it will just respond with a simple statement saying it's waiting for further instructions.
A key claim that anchors the narrative framing.
-
causal claim
Giving each response an ID In all seriousness, because you can instruct the AI to add text to every response, you can use the single most useful custom instruction I've found.
Cause-effect claim shaping how events are explained.
Evidence from source B
-
key claim
The AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any…
A key claim that anchors the narrative framing.
-
key claim
Material from the Associated Press is Copyright © 2026, Associated Press and may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
A key claim that anchors the narrative framing.
Bias/manipulation evidence
No concise text evidence snippets were extracted for this section yet.
How score signals are formed
Bias score signal
Bias signal combines framing pressure, emotional wording, selective emphasis, and one-sided narrative markers.
Emotionality signal
Emotionality rises when evidence contains emotionally loaded wording and evaluative labels.
One-sidedness signal
One-sidedness rises when one frame dominates and alternative interpretations are weakly represented.
Evidence strength signal
Evidence strength rises with concrete claims, attributed statements, and verifiable contextual support.
Source A
28%
emotionality: 31 · one-sidedness: 30
Detected in Source A
framing effect
Source B
34%
emotionality: 29 · one-sidedness: 35
Detected in Source B
false dilemma
Metrics
Framing differences
- Source A emotionality: 31/100 vs Source B: 29/100
- Source A one-sidedness: 30/100 vs Source B: 35/100
- Stance contrast: Screenshot by David Gewirtz/ZDNETSo, I can tell the AI something like, "Back in ID 031 you said blah-blah. Alternative framing: The AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.
Possible omitted/downplayed context
- Review which economic and policy factors each source keeps outside focus.
- Check whether alternative explanations are acknowledged.